This site was built with Sampa
Create a FREE Blog | More Sites
Helping Entrepreneurs build the next great business

Seattle 2.0 Blog

Week 28
SMTWTFS
14151617181920

July 17, 2007


TUE
17
JUL
2007

Naming 101

By Christopher Johnson

[Editor Note: This is the first post of a series of Seattle guest bloggers that are entrepreneurs or experienced professionals with startups. If you want to write about your experience that can be useful to other entrepreneurs send us an email.]

----

 

 

    If you're starting a company, you need to name it, and you probably can't afford to hire a big naming firm. Here's some free naming advice from The Name Inspector. If you want more advice, you can always hire an independent consultant!

 

    Naming is about coming up with lots of ideas and seeing which one sticks. The larger and more diverse the collection of names you come up with, the more likely you are to find something good. Involve people with different perspectives and try different styles of name.

 

    A name should be distinctive. This may seem obvious, but it's so important that it's worth saying anyway. Distinctive means not too similar to any of your competitors' names, available as a .com domain, and not associated with many Google results (at least not until you launch and the web goes crazy with hype for you).

 

    Usually the best names are not too literally descriptive of a company. You'll have other marketing materials to tell people exactly what you do. Your name is an opportunity to introduce extra concepts and feelings to people's idea of your company. It's the beginning of your brand.

 

    Some of the best tech names are metaphorical. A good metaphor makes a complicated technology or service seem simple by representing it as something that people understand from their everyday experience. Take the name PageFlakes, for an Ajax homepage service. It represents the little movable Ajax boxes that you can put on your homepage as flakes, which people know are small and lightweight and cling to things.

 

    Start by assembling a list of words. Most good names are built out of good words. So what are good words? Well, that's one of the tricky parts. But they're words that trigger relevant and positive associations, that sound good, and that are easy to combine with other words, word parts, and even nonsense syllables.

 

    Why should they be easy to combine? Because unless you're willing to shell out big bucks for a .com domain name, real single word names are basically out of the question. You'll need to come up with another type of name. Take a look at The Name Inspector's 10 name types post, and try to come up with names from each category (except initials and acronyms: not recommended). Some types of name are made out of word parts. To create those kinds of names, find the good words on your word list that can be whittled down without becoming completely unrecognizable (the way the word accurate can be shortened to accu and still be recognized).

 

    Please avoid names that end with a consonant followed by r (Flickr, Soonr, Zooomr, Flagr, Gabbr, Grazr, etc. ), and names that end with -ster (Napster, Friendster, Browster, Feedster, Dogster, Catster, Jobster, Eurekster, Jookster, etc.).

 

    Selecting the best name is as hard as coming up with a list of names. Having in mind a clear set of criteria really helps. Some will relate specifically to your company. Is it distinct from competitors' names? Does it evoke relevant ideas? Does it just feel right for the kind of company you're starting?

 

    Some criteria are more general. Good names tend to be relatively short, easy to remember, easy to pronounce when you read them, easy to spell when you hear them, easy to understand, and often have vivid sensory associations or interesting cultural resonance.

 

    Good luck with your startup, and good luck with your naming!

 

----

Christopher Johnson is the founder of Phrasetrain and writes the blog The Name Inspector.

3:34 PM | Permalink | 6 comments


Comments (6) for "Naming 101"
Unknown
You make a global recommendation above about 'avoiding names that end with a consonant followed by r'. Unfortunately this is one of the few strategies left for finding short product names in the .com TLD, since most two word compounds are also unavailable these days.

Could you be more specific about why you made that recommendation? While not every word ending in a double consonant works for me, I still find Flickr and Gabbr to be good choices that I would make today. They invoke a clear linguistic concept that can be reflected in the products they are associated with.

Even the '-ster' ending can still work for me, although it is a little harder on the ears and mind. Jobster is an example of a name I would still choose today, while staying far away from Eurekster, or Browster, mostly because of the lack of flow and the weird consonant combinations in they contain.

Any more thoughts on this out there?
By William Will - Wed, 18 Jul 2007 01:53:36 GMT
Unknown
William,

My general prohibition against these very specific name types was meant to be a comment on the existence of naming cliches and a little bit of a joke. I don't have a strong objection to the names on linguistic grounds, and think some of them are quite good. I wrote a very positive analysis of the name Flickr, for example. I just think these strategies are overused. Companies that launch with copycat names do not seem innovative. I understand the difficulty of finding a domain but am trying to encourage people to try other creative ways to do it.
By Christopher Johnson - Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:15:36 GMT
Unknown
I do tend to agree that they are considered an easy out by some. But I find compounds that are just as deplorable, and often with no connection to the product they describe.

As far as the copycat argument goes, I don't entirely follow you. Unless what you mean is that once a certain 'form' has been used and gained fame in a large brand, it becomes unusable to the rest of the world. That would mean that Flickr spoiled it for the 'consonant + r' ending. And 'oogle' is certainly a name part more or less off-bounds. Anything ending in 'ype' would need a lot of hype to succeed, and if you tried to put a 'hoo' at the end of your name, you better be ready to spend lots of marketing dollars to make it stick.

Alas, if I follow your argument, many more endings are actually unavailable these days. And synthetic words become very difficult to construct - at all, especially in English.

(Perhaps if I hadn't already settled on one of those .....r names myself after a very long selection process, I wouldn't be disagreeing quite as fervently.)
By William Will - Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:13:32 GMT
Unknown
It all depends on the specificity of the form and the reason for using it. Certainly there are bad compound names--there are bad names of every kind. But compounding is one of the main ways to make new words in English and has been for hundreds of years. It's not going away, and I would never tell someone not to use a compound name. Nor would I tell someone not to use an adjective + noun phrase or a common meaningful ending like the plural suffix -s, the participial ending -ing, or indeed the agentive ending -er. All those things are part of the language.

Omitting the "e" from the -er ending is something else. It's an orthographic gimmick and currently a fad. It's the web 2.0 equivalent of spelling "c" words with a "k" (krazy, krispy, etc.). I'm not trying to disparage names that have already used that gimmick. I'm merely saying that part of the namescape is a little crowded right now.

As for your hypothetical examples, I think if you end your name with -hoo or -oogle for the sole reason of having a name that resembles Yahoo or Google, then you have a copycat name. If there's another clear motivation for using one of those endings, go for it.
By Christopher Johnson - Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:07:33 GMT
Unknown
The bottom line is you need a name people will remember. If the content is there it doesn't really matter. At the end of the day I am going to remember a common word with a vowel removed over "seattle20.sampasite.com"
By jason - Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:48:48 GMT
Unknown
The bottom line is you need a name people will remember. If the content is there it doesn't really matter. At the end of the day I am going to remember a common word with a vowel removed over "seattle20.sampasite.com"
By jason - Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:49:14 GMT
Similar Content
Powered by Google



Get updates via email:

Subscribe to this site:

Bookmark this page:


 
Copyright © 2008 Seattle 2.0. All rights reserved. Redmond House For Sale